6800 vs 6800 xt benchmark

 

A comparison between Nvidia’s previous generation flagship, the 2080 Ti, and the 6800-XT shows that AMD now offer comparable raw performance at half the price. AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 6800 XT: 1080p benchmark. Clearly, neither the RX 6800 or RX 6800 are going to struggle playing games at 1920x1080 for the foreseeable future, as even the RX 6800 is capable of hitting at least 100fps on max settings here, while the RX 6800 XT is often pushing 120fps. However, as I said above, if playing games as close to 60fps is important to you, then the RX 6800 XT is much more likely to achieve those kinds of frame rates on High than the non-XT version. Overgrowth developer felt he "had no choice" in filing antitrust suit against Valve, Alleges Valve make it impossible for stores to compete on price, IGF's 2021 nominees announced, mostly correct, Teardown, Paradise Killer and Spiritfarer up for top prize, Slipways' open beta offers a pocket-sized grand strategy campaign, We've been talking, and we think that you should wear clothes, Total coincidence, but we sell some clothes. In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, for example, the RX 6800 hit a low of 42fps in its built-in benchmark versus the 6800 XT’s low of 49fps, while Final Fantasy XV saw the RX 6800 hit lows of 48fps, which is almost 10fps below the RX 6800 XT’s low of 56fps. Below is the comparison between RX 6800 XT and RTX 3080 graphics cards based on their specifications, performance, pricing, power consumption, and features. Respect others, think before you post, and be prepared for puns. The RX 6800 XT also struggles with Control on max settings (although given its max settings are technically called 'High', I've included them in the chart below to avoid confusion). Naturally, the RX 6800 XT's faster frame rates do come in handy when you start throwing ray tracing into the mix, especially if you want to play games at 1440p. Introduction . Benchmark Results of the AMD 6800 XT vs RTX 3080Subscribe for all the latest trailers and gameplay: http://goo.gl/8LO96FBecome a member! This review presents a fifteen-game VR performance showdown between the RX 6800 XT and the RTX 3080 using the Vive Pro and FCAT VR.. We have also added Assetto Corsa Competizione and Into the Radius for this review.. As I said in my RX 6800 XT review, the RTX 3080 is clearly the superior card at 4K, and you can read more about its 4K performance in my RTX 3080 vs 2080 and 2080 Super comparison article. Clearly, neither the RX 6800 or RX 6800 are going to struggle playing games at 1920×1080 for the foreseeable future, as even the RX 6800 is capable of hitting at least 100fps on max settings here, while the RX 6800 XT is often pushing 120fps. Control once again saw a nigh-on identical average frame rate from both cards - although the RX 6800 XT does pull ahead when you switch on the game's ray tracing support. No part of this site or its content may be reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. The 6800 XT trails the 6900 XT in performance but still manages to deliver a gaming experience that is in the vicinity of the more powerful cards. BenQ's Zowie XL2546K is a 240Hz monitor with an ultra premium price, It's all down to its special anti-motion blur tech, I'm slowly becoming obsessed with video game book shelves. Still, as powerful as today's graphics cards are, bumping up the resolution to 2560x1440 still puts the burden squarely back onto your GPU, making CPU bottlenecks much more unlikely. Today I want to show you AMD Big Navi Radeon RX 6800 XT 3DMark benchmark scores, that leaked from several sources. Please enable JavaScript to see comments. We love having a friendly, positive and constructive community - you lot are great - and we want to keep it like that. In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, for example, the RX 6800 hit a low of 42fps in its built-in benchmark versus the 6800 XT’s low of 49fps, while Final Fantasy XV saw the RX 6800 hit lows of 48fps, which is almost 10fps below the RX 6800 XT’s low of 56fps. In truth, you’re probably also better off going with Nvidia’s RTX 3070 instead of the regular RX 6800 for 4K gaming as well, as their respective speeds are both much of a muchness. Many thanks to XFX for the RX 6800 XT Speedster Merc 319 Black sample. Ende 2020 sorgte AMD mit der Radeon RX 6800, 6800 XT … It's a similar picture across other games, too, with the RX 6800 dipping much lower than the XT. Of course, unless you own a high refresh rate monitor, opting for the RX 6800 XT won't get you any benefit at all, as monitors with a standard 60Hz refresh rate will display the same 60fps regardless of which card's inside your PC. Again, there are exceptions to this rule. Of course, that’s not surprising given how expensive they are. Overall, then, it’s clear that both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are both incredibly powerful graphics cards, capable of filling out high refresh rate monitors at both 1080p and 1440p, and hitting consistent 60fps frame rates on Medium to High settings at 4K. Whack the quality down to Medium, however, and the XT’s performance bump starts to become less obvious again. She's also RPS' resident deals herald. I might just about be able to distinguish between 105fps and close to 130fps in something like The Witcher III, for example, but 80-90fps is all much of a muchness to my eyes. With the exception of Control, the RX 6800 XT delivers speeds well in excess of 60fps here, once again leading by 10-12fps over the RX 6800. I might just about be able to distinguish between 105fps and close to 130fps in something like The Witcher III, for example, but 80-90fps is all much of a muchness to my eyes. Please see our code of conduct, where you can find out what "be excellent" means. The $1,000 USD 6900-XT offers a small improvement (11% more compute units) over the already launched $650 USD RX 6800-XT. Admittedly, the latter can also still just about hit an average of 60fps in most of my benchmark games on High, but there’s no denying you’ll get smoother overall frame rates by opting for the XT here. As a result, the extra horsepower you get with the RX 6800 XT will help push those minimum frame rates up much closer to a more consistent 60fps, making it much more likely that you’ll be able to carry on playing games at this kind of quality setting in the years to come. I ran both cards at their default clock speeds as well, so the figures below should be pretty representative of what you’ll find on other types of RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT cards made by third party manufacturers. Again, there are exceptions to this rule. I've also kept ray tracing switched off for this particular comparison test, as I'll be taking a closer look at next-gen ray tracing performance across all of the new AMD and Nvidia GPUs in a dedicated comparison piece. Needless to say, ray tracing at 4K is pretty much out of the question on these cards right now, but even if you’re just looking to buy a 4K card in general, I’d probably still side with the RX 6800 here, if only because once you start hitting the £600 / $650 mark, you might as well opt for Nvidia’s RTX 3080 rather than AMD’s RX 6800 XT at this resolution. Compute performance of Radeon RX 6800 series leaks. The dynamic between the two companies is a blessing for well informed users who can save money without compromising on performance. ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming: 12. A comparison between Nvidia’s previous generation flagship, the 2080 Ti, and the 6800-XT shows that AMD now offer comparable raw performance at half the price. Of course, that’s hardly surprising given how expensive they are, and in most cases the RX 6800 XT has a decent lead on its non-XT sibling. AMD’s two RX 6000 cards are still highly capable in this department, though, with the RX 6800 hitting at last 75-80fps in today’s big blockbusters, while the RX 6800 XT is hitting at least 90fps. All rights reserved. As such, you’ll likely see better performance from the RX 6800 XT at 1080p if you pair it with a more powerful processor, such as one of Intel’s Core i7s or AMD’s Ryzen 7 chips. Auf der zweiten Seite unseres Tests der Radeon RX 6700 XT gibt's die Benchmark-Ergebnisse und natürlich auch den GPU-Leistungsindex. The RX 6800-XT delivers a huge generational jump in performance. Admittedly, both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are sold out almost everywhere at the moment, making them as difficult to buy as Nvidia's equally new RTX 30 series. ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G: 10. I suspect this is likely due to the RX 6800 XT being limited by my CPU in these particular circumstances, as I saw a very similar thing happen with these particular games in my RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 3070 comparison article as well. To help answer that question, I've put together some lovely bar graphs of my 1080p, 1440p and 4K benchmark results, showing you exactly how they stack up across all the major resolutions. Overall, then, it's clear that both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are both incredibly powerful graphics cards, capable of filling out high refresh rate monitors at both 1080p and 1440p, and hitting consistent 60fps frame rates on Medium to High settings at 4K. MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio 16G vs. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER JET - GPU comparison with benchmark However, while the RX 6800 XT is clearly the faster card of the two, I'd probably err on the side of the regular RX 6800 as being the better value card overall. 6800-XT 3070 2080-Ti. The RX 6800-XT delivers a huge generational jump in performance. AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs 6800 XT: benchmarks compared January 25, 2021 wpadmin AMD’s long-awaited Big Navi GPUs, the Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, are finally here. Here, the RX 6800 XT managed an average of just 45fps, which is still just about playable, but it’s very much on the borderline of what I’d call an acceptable frame rate. The RX 6800 (top) is exactly the same size as the RX 6800 XT (below), just a bit thinner. When you’re dealing with powerful graphics cards like this at 1920×1080, any potential bottlenecks are almost certainly going to be related to your CPU rather than your GPU at this resolution, and it can make a surprising amount of difference to your PC’s overall performance. AMD have upgraded the single fan cooler to a more efficient triple fan solution, perhaps indicating a shift in focus from benchmark busting headlines to user experience. There’s no denying the RX 6800 XT has buckets of power at its disposal, but when it comes to overall value, the regular RX 6800 is tough to beat. As I mentioned right at the top of this article, I'll be doing a separate ray tracing comparison piece with all of today's next-gen graphics cards very soon, so watch out for that to get a better idea of how things stack up. Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on the RDNA 2 architecture on the TSMC 7nm manufacturing process. That said, there are a couple of games where the RX 6800 isn’t that far behind the RX 6800 XT. GPU Architecture. In terms of the GPU architecture, both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are equipped with AMD RDNA2 7nm GPUs, the same GPU architecture used in latest PS5 and X series X. Obviously, you won’t have a hard time playing games on either the RX6800 or RX6800 1920 x 1080 For the time being, even the RX 6800 can reach at least 100fps at maximum settings here, while the RX 6800 XT often pushes 120fps. The RX 6800 XT gives it a pretty good shot, hitting 60fps in pretty much everything but two games on max settings, but there are still cases where it falls down closer to the 40-50fps mark, such as in Total War: Three Kingdoms and Monster Hunter: World. To test the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, I paired them with my usual Intel Core i5-10600K processor and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance LED RAM, and put them head to head in my suite of graphics benchmarks, taking an average frame rate from their own built-in benchmark tools or from my own repeatable manual gameplay tests. AMD has released a slew of gaming benchmark results for the RX 6800, RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT, offering a look at how its RDNA 2 cards stack up against NVIDIA's recent efforts. Indeed, even if you do own a high refresh rate monitor that goes above 60Hz, I'm not sure I'd be able to tell the difference between 80 and 90fps without the aid of a frame rate counter. Indeed, until AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution tech comes out, you shouldn’t really be buying either RX 6000 card for 4K gaming at the moment, as their raw performance just can’t compete with what you get with Nvidia’s RTX cards with DLSS turned on (although again I’ll be doing more in-depth benchmark comparisons between AMD and Nvidia’s new cards very soon). 2080 6800-XT 3070. Control once again saw a nigh-on identical average frame rate from both cards – although the RX 6800 XT does pull ahead when you switch on the game’s ray tracing support. The RX 6800 XT gives it a pretty good shot, hitting 60fps in pretty much everything but two games on max settings, but there are still cases where it falls down closer to the 40-50fps mark, such as in Total War: Three Kingdoms and Monster Hunter: World. On Medium, though, the RX 6800 has more than enough power to hit a consistent 60fps at 4K - although as Control once again proves, there will still be the odd game out there that taxes both cards equally, regardless of quality setting. Sign up today and get access to more articles like these, an ad-free reading experience, free gifts, and help us create more great writing about PC games. Of course, that's hardly surprising given how expensive they are, and in most cases the RX 6800 XT has a decent lead on its non-XT sibling. Here, the RX 6800 XT managed an average of just 45fps, which is still just about playable, but it's very much on the borderline of what I'd call an acceptable frame rate. AMD’s long-awaited Big Navi GPUs, the Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, are finally here. RT graphics performance is an area that AMD cards have been unable to compete, but that all changes with the RDNA2 architecture, the Big Navi cards and specifically the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT … On Medium, though, the RX 6800 has more than enough power to hit a consistent 60fps at 4K – although as Control once again proves, there will still be the odd game out there that taxes both cards equally, regardless of quality setting. Of course, you could say the same about the RX 6800 XT’s speeds on High quality settings, and there is some truth in that. We not guarrantee the accouracy of any of the external content feeds. Die Performance der Radeon RX 6800 (XT) ist katastrophal, sodass selbst eine RX 5700 (XT) in Full HD davonzieht. PC Details $1,134 +2%. Stutters & Frame Drops. 16GB of VRAM is a key feature of the 6800 cards. If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Intel 9600K $210. The RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, might still struggle to hit 60fps at 1440p with maxed out ray tracing, but its smoother 55fps average frame rates are still pretty darn close. PCGH testet, wie das ausgeht. Elsewhere on High settings, however, the RX 6800 XT does put in quite an impressive performance over its non-XT sibling. Elsewhere on High settings, however, the RX 6800 XT does put in quite an impressive performance over its non-XT sibling. Of course, unless you own a high refresh rate monitor, opting for the RX 6800 XT won’t get you any benefit at all, as monitors with a standard 60Hz refresh rate will display the same 60fps regardless of which card’s inside your PC. AMD Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT OpenCL performance. When it comes to 1440p, it leads by anywhere between 2 FPS (Battlefield V) to 15 FPS (Wolfenstein Youngblood), while both GPUs trading blows with the Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3000 series counterparts. But how do they compare performance-wise and which one should you consider buying when they finally come back in stock? Admittedly, the latter can also still just about hit an average of 60fps in most of my benchmark games on High, but there's no denying you'll get smoother overall frame rates by opting for the XT here. VS Watch Gameplay. As such, you'll likely see better performance from the RX 6800 XT at 1080p if you pair it with a more powerful processor, such as one of Intel's Core i7s or AMD's Ryzen 7 chips. But how do they compare performance-wise and which one should you consider buying when they finally come back in stock? We conducted our tests on the same $550, 144Hz Nixeus EDG34S monitor as … AMD have upgraded the single fan cooler to a more efficient triple fan solution, perhaps indicating a shift in focus from benchmark busting headlines to user experience. The release of the RX 6800 explains why Nvidia doubled performance per dollar with their 3000 series release just a few weeks ago. It's not a huge improvement, though. In Assassin's Creed Valhalla, for example, the RX 6800 hit a low of 42fps in its built-in benchmark versus the 6800 XT's low of 49fps, while Final Fantasy XV saw the RX 6800 hit lows of 48fps, which is almost 10fps below the RX 6800 XT's low of 56fps. For the most part, though, there's a clear gap between these two cards, with the RX 6800 XT leading by around 10-15fps depending on the title. RX 6800 XT vs RTX 3080 Comparison. However, while the RX 6800 XT is clearly the faster card of the two, I’d probably err on the side of the regular RX 6800 as being the better value card overall. As a result, it may be worth sticking with the regular RX 6800 if you’re planning to play games at 1440p, as I’m not sure you’re really getting one hundred quid’s worth of extra performance here. With the exception of Control, the RX 6800 XT delivers speeds well in excess of 60fps here, once again leading by 10-12fps over the RX 6800. As I mentioned right at the top of this article, I’ll be doing a separate ray tracing comparison piece with all of today’s next-gen graphics cards very soon, so watch out for that to get a better idea of how things stack up. Indeed, until AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution tech comes out, you shouldn't really be buying either RX 6000 card for 4K gaming at the moment, as their raw performance just can't compete with what you get with Nvidia's RTX cards with DLSS turned on (although again I'll be doing more in-depth benchmark comparisons between AMD and Nvidia's new cards very soon). AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 6800 XT 3440x1440 ultrawide benchmarks Brad Chacos/IDG. Of course, you could say the same about the RX 6800 XT's speeds on High quality settings, and there is some truth in that. Whereas the 6800 XT can be expected to reach a boost clock of about 2,250MHz (more on third-party cards with OC), the RX 6800 reaches somewhere around about 150MHz less. The RX 6900-XT assumes the flagship position in AMD’s latest RX 6000 series of GPUs which deliver a huge generational jump in performance. Our main commenting rule is "be excellent to each other". There's no denying the RX 6800 XT has buckets of power at its disposal, but when it comes to overall value, the regular RX 6800 is tough to beat. Still, as powerful as today’s graphics cards are, bumping up the resolution to 2560×1440 still puts the burden squarely back onto your GPU, making CPU bottlenecks much more unlikely. Auf der zweiten Seite unseres Tests der Radeon RX 6800 (XT) gibt's die Benchmark-Ergebnisse und den GPU-Leistungsindex. It still has around a 10fps lead on its non-XT sibling here, sometimes reaching closer to 15-20fps, but with high refresh rate monitors still being relatively scarce at 4K, you’re more likely to hit the 60fps threshold on both cards here, negating that extra lead offered by the XT. A comparison between Nvidia’s previous generation flagship, the 2080 Ti, and the 6800-XT shows that AMD now offer comparable raw performance at half the price. At the moment, the RX 6800 can do ray tracing at 60fps no problem at 1080p, but bump the resolution up to 1440p and you’re looking at frame rates closer to 45fps with the top RT settings enabled. TL;DR? At 1080p and 1440p, I’m just not convinced you’re going to notice the extra performance offered by the XT at these resolutions, at least not when it comes to raw performance. At higher resolutions and detail settings, performance can … ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: 11. At 1080p and 1440p, I'm just not convinced you're going to notice the extra performance offered by the XT at these resolutions, at least not when it comes to raw performance. Of course, that's hardly surprising given how expensive they are, and in most cases the RX … I’ve also kept ray tracing switched off for this particular comparison test, as I’ll be taking a closer look at next-gen ray tracing performance across all of the new AMD and Nvidia GPUs in a dedicated comparison piece. Needless to say, ray tracing at 4K is pretty much out of the question on these cards right now, but even if you're just looking to buy a 4K card in general, I'd probably still side with the RX 6800 here, if only because once you start hitting the £600 / $650 mark, you might as well opt for Nvidia's RTX 3080 rather than AMD's RX 6800 XT at this resolution. I ran both cards at their default clock speeds as well, so the figures below should be pretty representative of what you'll find on other types of RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT cards made by third party manufacturers. In the internal duel, the RX 6800 XT clearly surpasses the performance of a Radeon RX 5700 XT. VR Wars: The RX 6800 XT vs. the RTX 3080 – 15 Games Performance benchmarked using the Vive Pro. To test the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, I paired them with my usual Intel Core i5-10600K processor and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance LED RAM, and put them head to head in my suite of graphics benchmarks, taking an average frame rate from their own built-in benchmark tools or from my own repeatable manual gameplay tests. At Geekbench the alleged benchmark result of the upcoming Radeon RX 6800 series have been spotted by APISAK.These are, unfortunately, the Geekbench 4.4 results (the software’s 5.1.2 version is already available). Katharine writes about all the bits that go inside your PC so you can carry on playing all those lovely games we like talking about so much. It’s a similar picture across other games, too, with the RX 6800 dipping much lower than the XT. Admittedly, both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are sold out almost everywhere at the moment, making them as difficult to buy as Nvidia’s equally new RTX 30 series. Very partial to JRPGs and the fetching of quests. We put AMD's two Big Navi cards head to head. The RX 6800 XT also struggles with Control on max settings (although given its max settings are technically called ‘High’, I’ve included them in the chart below to avoid confusion). The games include a mix of blockbusters from the last couple of years: Shadow Of The Tomb Raider, Total War: Three Kingdoms, Final Fantasy XV, Monster Hunter: World, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, The Witcher 3, Metro Exodus and Control. It still has around a 10fps lead on its non-XT sibling here, sometimes reaching closer to 15-20fps, but with high refresh rate monitors still being relatively scarce at 4K, you're more likely to hit the 60fps threshold on both cards here, negating that extra lead offered by the XT. The RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, might still struggle to hit 60fps at 1440p with maxed out ray tracing, but its smoother 55fps average frame rates are still pretty darn close. I've also used AMD's versions of the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, as these were the cards I used for my respective GPU reviews. Overall, the RX 6800 XT was 4-6 percent faster when overclocked (the higher results were at 4K). But how do they compare performance-wise and which one should you consider buying when they finally come back in stock? The release of the 6000 series explains why Nvidia doubled performance per dollar when they released their 3070 just a few weeks ago. Whack the quality down to Medium, however, and the XT's performance bump starts to become less obvious again. Ultimately, though, I reckon the RX 6800 is the one to try and get out of AMD's new crop of Big Navi cards when it eventually comes back in stock, especially if you're after a top notch 1440p GPU.